Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CynicalBear
If someone staggered up to you on the street, smelled of liquor and had slurred speech, you could easily infer they were drunk. No blood test, you could infer this.

A child is dead, last seen with the mother, decomp found in her car, child thrown away in items from her home, instead of calling to alert police to an accident she hides it for a month, and only tells then because she has to. Further yet, she never shows one ounce of fear, or pain, or concern during that time. when given the chance to tell it was an accident she lies to the extent that this becomes a national story. That is why this became so well known - not because a child was missing, that happens all the time it was her actions afterwards. No one could believe any mother anywhere could continue lie after lie after lie.

The only reason she got off is because the body wasn't found in time to determine if she chloroformed the baby, broke her neck, as she investigated ways to do on her computer, or if she died by accident.

There is no doubt she was last seen with her mother then was dead and no explanation in between. Any adult with sense could put those things together without a video proving it

404 posted on 07/07/2011 8:13:38 AM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Going into Rehab means never having to say you are sorry....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies ]


To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
A child is dead, last seen with the mother, decomp found in her car, child thrown away in items from her home.

Instead of calling to alert police to an accident, she HIDES it for a month, and only tells then because she has to.

Further yet, she never shows one ounce of fear, or pain, or concern during that time.

When given the chance to tell it was an accident, she LIES to the extent that this becomes a national story.

Evidently you are displaying too much commonsense for Hannity and a few people here on FR.

This mother didn't ever report that baby missing. The grandmother did.

Anyone who had a 2 yr old missing for 10 minutes would call 911.

430 posted on 07/07/2011 8:24:35 AM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies ]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
>>Any adult with sense could put those things together without a video proving it <<

But the prosecution didn’t did they. The prosecutor himself admitted that they couldn’t prove that it was actually a murder. The prosecution could have either tried to prove murder or accident but not both. They stressed murder but couldn’t prove even cause of death. They tied the hands of the jury by trying to prove murder or homicide but didn’t have enough evidence to prove it wasn’t an accident. Thus the dilemma of the jury which put them in a box of having to decide “beyond a reasonable doubt” that a murder was committed which even the prosecutor admitted they couldn’t prove.

443 posted on 07/07/2011 8:29:37 AM PDT by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies ]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA

The only thing that I’d add to your summary of the evidence is that the mother never came home during the 31 days that the child was not reported missing. There was always some phony excuse — at the nanny’s, at the beach, at tony’s, etc. ad nauseum.


448 posted on 07/07/2011 8:32:36 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies ]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
The only reason she got off is because the body wasn't found in time to determine if she chloroformed the baby, broke her neck,

..and that falls directly in Casey's lap for her lies which diverted the authorities onto wild goose chases.

690 posted on 07/07/2011 1:20:28 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson