Reasonable people can disagree about things.
I don’t believe that there was enough of the cicumstantial evidence - a convincing trail - that was strong enough to have induced me to vote for murder here. I believe if you are sentencing someone to death you need a far more solid case than the prosecutor here presented.
Mark Levin, a Constitutional Attorney and a conservative, and Judge Napolitano, another constitutionalist and solid conservative, agree with me on this.
HOWEVER, if she killed the kid, there's only one factor ~ she killed the kid.
We don't have degrees of Live kid, part live kid, part dead kid, dead kid. The child is dead or alive, and it's pretty obvious she didn't do it to herself. BTW, that's "circumstantial evidence" ~ the fact that Kaylee didn't commit suicide! Even the most hardcore "I's gots' ta' sees it mysef" type might well be moved to agree on that.
Any link, however minor in significance, that tells us that Casey killed Kaylee is sufficient!