Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: buggy02

No surprise at all.

The State couldn’t even produce an expert to say how the child died.

As one of the judges before whom I practiced was fond of saying, “I’m suspicious that you are guilty, but that’s not guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Unless you want a police state (which we are getting to FAST), you will get verdicts like this one.


16 posted on 07/05/2011 12:32:59 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RIghtwardHo

Yet with Scott Peterson a few years ago the result was a death penalty conviction based on 100% circumstantial evidence with a dash of blatant prosecutorial misconduct thrown in for good measure.

I’ve always hated that case because I followed it at the start and the police were bound and determined that he was their man. Every new fact that surfaced they’d just change their story to show how that made him guilty.

Peterson was a crappy excuse for a husband, no doubt, but that didn’t mean he killed his wife.


30 posted on 07/05/2011 12:38:00 PM PDT by MeganC (NO WAR FOR OIL! ........except when a Democrat's in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: RIghtwardHo
No surprise at all.

The surprise to me is that they found a jury that wouldn't be bulldozed by what the prosecution called evidence. I wouldn't have needed any of the defense's claptrap to wonder where was the prosecution's beef.

38 posted on 07/05/2011 12:42:07 PM PDT by Stentor ( "All cults of personality begin as high drama and end as low comedy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: RIghtwardHo
Duh, the baby stopped breathing. That'll do it every time.

Real simple case. Woman has baby. Baby disappears. Woman says baby is with baby sitter. No baby sitter exists.

Some time later baby's remains are found in a swamp.

The fact the woman lied about the baby in her custody is more than suspicious.

The only thing to do after that is figure out the charges.

This jury was given a wide choice of charges. They elected to decide the woman had lied to the police.

Hmm.

Not sure I'd let those folks get a mortgage!

Fur Shur I wouldn't let Casey Anthony loose in my house or around my younger relatives.

41 posted on 07/05/2011 12:43:02 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: RIghtwardHo

The judge also said, to the members of the jury to discount evidence and testimony that doesn’t fit.

The jury wasn’t prepared to deal with a psychopath. Her defense should have been completely ignored.

The prosecution should have played the underlying evil up a lot more, not just closing remarks.


80 posted on 07/05/2011 12:54:15 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: RIghtwardHo

I guess it is better than the guilty get away rather than the innocent suffer, unless of course she ends up killing someone else, which she well may.

Remember OJ. He just ended up in jail for another crime, because as Agatha Christie always said, true murderers are arrogant.

On the bright side, OJ seems to have had a great life since then. My guess is Anthony will have the same joy - the sheriff right now is warning people not to target the Anthonys!


116 posted on 07/05/2011 1:06:12 PM PDT by I still care (I miss my friends, bagels, and the NYC skyline - but not the taxes. I love the South.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson