To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
nope, google has no respect for peoples privacy.
2 posted on
06/29/2011 12:00:32 PM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: driftdiver
Good point. Being on FB is bad enough. There’s bots that scrub their data to sell to emoployers. I could just imagine what Google would do.
4 posted on
06/29/2011 12:05:41 PM PDT by
for-q-clinton
(If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
To: driftdiver
To: driftdiver
Plus they’re in bed with the Chicoms.
13 posted on
06/29/2011 3:05:54 PM PDT by
Emperor Palpatine
(Can you afford to board the Chattanooga Choo-Choo?)
To: driftdiver
The word on the street is Google+ has great privacy settings. Of course that’s now. What happens when they have 50 million people’s info to sell.
14 posted on
06/29/2011 3:07:43 PM PDT by
discostu
(Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson