Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: massmike
Witterick and Stocker believe they are giving their children the freedom to choose who they want to be, unconstrained by social norms about males and females.

How did these two morons manage to conceive?

And let the little crumb-cruncher try wandering into the wrong bathroom under guise of "countering the insidious practice of gender-norming" or somesuch.

He will be on so many sexual-predator lists; she, if older, will be sexually harrassed in a heartbeat.

Next stop: bestiality. ("Why be speciesist in love?")

NO cheers, unfortunately.

8 posted on 05/22/2011 9:12:25 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers

This is unbelievable.

I notice the article says they vacationed in Cuba, and spent time there learning about the revolution. And they spent time in Mexico with some rebel groups who had been fighting the government there.

The mom and dad have different last names, so that right there tips us off that they are liberal radical types, having to make that particular political statement.

Yep, all of society, and every culture on earth, is wrong about gender roles, gender norms, all of that. Only these 2 liberal parents know what is best for the world. (sarcasm)

What is better for the kids? Being raised genderless in a world in which male and female are universal constants, AND, always having to fight to explain things to the rest of the unenlightened world which has no clue what you are doing or why you are doing it? Or is it better to conform to societal expectations so that the rest of your life runs more smoothly?

I guess radical liberal types want to fight with everybody, every day, about how enlightened they are, rather than conform.

It would be intersting to test these parents in some ways. For example, what if I want the wife for myself? What if I want their house and all their personal belongings, because I think the social norm of private property, home ownership, the status of their marriage, etc. is simply a social construct which doesn’t allow us to really express our true feelings. What would their reactions be to something like that? Would they excuse that because of someone else expressing themselves, or would they fall back on social norms regarding those issues?


14 posted on 05/22/2011 9:34:49 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson