Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jubal Harshaw

Pardon me, but “frame up” is just a ridiculous interpretation. They repeated the procedure and found nothing worth further investigation. our delicate sensitivities may have been offended, but there was no harm.


8 posted on 05/02/2011 9:18:42 PM PDT by delacoert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: delacoert

They performed a test on an obviously adulterated sample, then lied about the existence of that adulteration. I believe that the only reason the second test came out negative is because there was an independent police officer watching the second test. They didn’t know that the police officer would be there for the second test, and I have no doubt that the second test would have come out a lot worse than the first had the police officer not been there.


11 posted on 05/02/2011 9:24:24 PM PDT by Jubal Harshaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: delacoert

There WAS harm. The man are falsely accused of testing positive for explosives and had to go through two sessions of sexual molestation because of TSA carelessness.


15 posted on 05/02/2011 9:44:03 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: delacoert; Jubal Harshaw

Their very EXISTENCE IS A HARM. How dare you?


40 posted on 05/03/2011 12:34:33 AM PDT by EvasiveManuever (Shakespeare got it wrong. Not the lawyers... journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson