Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: djf

You’ve missed the real history around the term natural born citizen. And Vattel was writing about international law, and admits it doesn’t apply to how England handled things.

I suggest reading this 1844 decision on what was meant by NBC:

http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/Lynch_v_Clarke_1844_ocr.pdf


48 posted on 04/30/2011 8:43:27 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (Poor history is better than good fiction, and anything with lots of horses is better still)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers
Vattel was writing about international law, and admits it doesn’t apply to how England handled things.

This is a bunch of crap. Vattel pointed out that England chooses to naturalize at birth the children of aliens. That's fine, but those people are still naturalized. They are not natural, indigenous, or natural born. You have been corrected on this point before yet you keep posting this false information. Please stop posting lies to FreeRepublic.com.

90 posted on 04/30/2011 5:13:49 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson