[MamaTexan]

LOL! Not only have you cherry picked from the beginning of a very lenghty decison, you ignore the fact that we are NOT in England, and we are not 'subjects'.

You continually try to twist Wong Kim Ark on every thread.

From the link above:

"that he was a native-born citizen of the United States"
[note it says NATIVE BORN not natural born]

"The child of an alien, if born in the country, is as much a citizen as the natural born child of a citizen, and by operation of the same principle."
[NOTE: it says 'just as much a citizen'...it does NOT the citizen in question IS natural born]

-----

BTW-

1} You can't petition a court as one thing and have it declare you something else,

and

2} Deriding a man like Vattel (whose brilliance had even the Founders in awe) by using such haphazard evidence makes you look rather foolish.

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

Smack! So Wong Kim Ark does NOT dispute Vattel/Natrual born? “Native born” instead of “natural born”. Anti-certifigaters have been parroting a lie?

[Repeating your link]

United States v. Wong Kim Ark (No. 18)
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0169_0649_ZO.html