Posted on 04/28/2011 7:12:50 AM PDT by Marty62
While the release of Barack Obama's birth certificate was the big news of the day, it wasn't the only new document about Obama's life published on Wednesday. A far more interesting trove of documents has also been unearthed by Heather Smathers, an investigative journalist writing in the Arizona Independent, a weekly newspaper.
Smathers made an Freedom of Information Act request for the US immigration service file on Obama's father, Barack Obama senior – and it contains a disturbing picture of Obama senior's treatment by government and university officials.
As early as 1961, a memo in the file notes a statement from a Mrs McCabe, a foreign student adviser at the University of Hawaii:
Mrs McCabe further states that Subject [Obama senior] has been running around with several girls since he first arrived here and last summer she cautioned him about his playboy ways. Subject replied that he would 'try' to stay away from the girls.
The memo also considers Obama senior's earlier Kenya marriage, and after noting that "polygamy is not an excludable or deportation charge," it recommends that "the Subject be closely questioned before another extention is granted – and denial be considered."
(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...
Hawaii Statutory Rape Laws
Hawaii statutory rape laws were created in order to protect adolescence from mature sexual influences and situations. Statutory rape is categorized in different degrees; all degrees are considered a felony, but some degrees are less punishable then others. The age of consent in Hawaii is 17; any individual over 18 engaging in sexual relations with another individual under the age of 17 could potentially face criminal charges. First-degree statutory rape in Hawaii is any sexual act with another person under the age of 14 when the offender is over 18. It is also considered first-degree statutory rape when an individual five years older than a 14-16 year old engages in sexual relations with any individual between 14-16.
.......................
Looks like BO’s daddy just made it under the wire for a RAPE charge.
The same way his son did.
The same way his son did.
sfl
Ping. I think we now know what the “half written” part is supposed to be. But they still can’t mesh all the lies into a cohesive story, because if these handwritten notes are the handwritten half of his BC - and why what was presented yesterday is an ABSTRACT - it doesn’t explain how he could have been born at Kapiolani and still need a supplementary handwritten INS record to complete the BC.
This thread should be read from the start. I have to do real-life stuff; things are getting away from me here at home because I’ve been spending too much time trying to sort out the barrage of propaganda being put out the last 2 days. But maybe if other eyes are looking at this we can catch some of the garbage before it gets all the way around the world twice.
F student = foreign student
Maybe Anna Obama was a Filipina.
One other thing I need some help with. Maybe people can figure this out while I’m doing some real life (sigh).
Document A is laid on top of Document B and there is ink from Document B that bleeds through so much onto A that when A is photocopied the correct-appearing print from B is on the photocopy of A.
How would that happen? It’s very important.
Now I better do the important work of getting food, decorations, and instrumental and vocal service music ready for my son’s confirmation celebration on Sunday and a dress ready for my daughter’s prom on Saturday.
It never rains but what it pours.
Thanks for the ping. You are on fire today! Prayers you get all your real life stuff done in a smooth and satisfactory way. Re: the rest, you hit the nail on the head. Obama’s lies have hit critical mass. No way they can sustain through ‘12. His goose is already cooked; he just doesn’t (appear to) realize it yet.
Since Stan was 2 months pregnant when they got married, I wonder if ole daddy dunham threatened BO Sr with deportation unless he married his 17 year old daughter?
Obviously an American son would not have been a valid reason to request an extension of time to stay in the U.S.
/s
"Document A is laid on top of Document B and there is ink from Document B that bleeds through so much onto A that when A is photocopied the correct-appearing print from B is on the photocopy of A. How would that happen? It’s very important." wet ink and thin paper can cause this. It's called offsetting.
Wet ink from a copier? A printer?
Yes, Duplo, Riso and Ricoh all make a wet ink copier.
You look it up.
The British Nationality Act of 1949 confers nationality ONLY on the legitimate children of a first marriage.
The law specifically deals with tribal or native marriages in Kenya and elsewhere.
There is NO WAY Obama jr. could have acquired UK nationality from Obama sr., because, as you correctly point out, his parents were not legally married.
Butter, I think all this documentation is pretty conclusive - except as to paternity.
I doubt that BHO Sr. was ever sure that he wasn’t swindled - and neither am I.
What documentation are you talking about specifically? The green copy that’s been electronically layered? The white copy that has no seal on it? Obama Sr’s 1962 application for an extension of his permission to be in the US, in which he didn’t claim to have Obama Sr as his son? The reporter’s claim that Obama Sr’s advisor had said Sr’s wife was planning to work at the university, when the advisor’s “memo” said she was planning to take classes in Seattle (so what the normal non-curious people see fits the official narrative but what the investigators see fits the records from Seattle)?
The whole thing is so full of discrepancies it’s incredible. I haven’t finished sorting out the evidence to make it clear to everybody, but I’m almost certain that neither of the copies Obama put out yesterday actually came from the HDOH, although what they got from the HDOH was probably used to create those 2 copies. Fukino claimed that what the HDOH has is “half typed, half written”, and Abercrombie had said there was something “actually written down” in the State Archive.
The certifying statement was modified to allow them to certify just about anything. See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2711155/posts?page=1400#1400 . Given that what Obama presented is not “half typed, half handwritten”, if we take Fukino at her word there is more to Obama’s record and what we’ve seen is a mere ABSTRACT of whatever was in the written part. The problem is that if Obama was born at Kapiolani Hospital and all the dates are what is claimed on what Obama presented, there would be no need for supplementary, written evidence. And if there was supplementary, written evidence there is legally supposed to be a note of that on the BC itself.
I believe that the “half written” part may be this handwritten memo that coincidentally showed up today, where the INS file has Obama NOT CLAIMING in 1962 to have a son named Barack Hussein Obama II but his ADVISOR claiming he had a son - born on Aug 4, 1961 in Honolulu, no less - with a girl from SEATTLE. In all his wanting an extension to stay in the US for his studies it never occurred to him that if he just mentioned his son who was born in Honolulu on Aug 4, 1961 he would be more likely to get an extension...
None of it makes sense. I’m going nuts trying to get home stuff taken care of today while wishing I could keep digging and sorting this out, but if you start at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2711803/posts?page=27#27 and keep reading you can see some of what doesn’t make sense to me.
And I think you know me well enough by now that you realize that if there are discrepancies and red flags going up all over the place I’m not prepared to just gloss that over in order to get people to think I’m “reasonable” or not a “conspiracy theorist”. What matters to me is to make sense out of the data we have, and right now none of it makes sense. Nothing pans out on any of the big document dump of yesterday and today.
If Stanley Ann was a virgin and they were only together a few times, he might have known he was the father. But with her who knows?
This is, of course, why the common law did not assign paternity to the offspring of single women - because whores are usually also liars.
The Supreme Court’s reversal of 1000 years of common law and bastardy statutes in 1973 (same court, same term as Roe) has caused all sorts of trouble.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.