To: piytar
Another issue, which may have been pointed out elsewhere: Obama’s number on the certificate is 10641. He was born on 8/4 and the certificate was accepted on 8/8 (which itself is another issue). The certificates of twin daughters born on 8/5 and not accepted until 8/11 were numbered 10637 and 10638. Same hospital, too.
I’m wondering what Corsi has to say about all this.
68 posted on
04/27/2011 11:40:15 AM PDT by
1L
To: 1L
It may be that two different sections of the hospital or two different doctors were each given a stack of B/C forms for the week, and used them up as they went along.
It's not necessarily suspicious, at least not for 1961.
73 posted on
04/27/2011 11:48:12 AM PDT by
agere_contra
("Debt is the foundation of destruction" : Sarah Palin.)
To: 1L
Another issue, which may have been pointed out elsewhere: Obamas number on the certificate is 10641. He was born on 8/4 and the certificate was accepted on 8/8 (which itself is another issue). The certificates of twin daughters born on 8/5 and not accepted until 8/11 were numbered 10637 and 10638. Same hospital, too. The Kapiolani Hospial's maternity ward Delivery Book would have an entry for this birth which would clarify that problem. But....
75 posted on
04/27/2011 11:51:16 AM PDT by
WhiskeyX
To: 1L
IIRC, Corsi has said the seemingly out-of-order certificate numbers was simply caused by stacks of blanks being handed out to several clerks, which then used whichever one was next.
88 posted on
04/27/2011 1:30:41 PM PDT by
fightinJAG
(I am sick of people adding their comments to titles in the title box. Thank you.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson