Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Dead Corpse; spunkets
There is no factor of "2" in the equation. the equation is 48*1/2*12

Po po chile. First, 48÷2(9+3) is not an equation. It's an expression. Second, as written, everything on the left of the division sign is divided by everything on the right for at least three reasons: 1. there is nothing in the notation that indicates 2 is the sole divisor of the dividend 48, only parentheses enclosing 48 and 2 could do that, 2. there is nothing in the notation that indicates (9+3) is not a cofactor of 2, only parentheses enclosing 48 and 2 could do that, and 3. the placing of the 2 next to the parentheses, in the absence of any operational sign, makes 2 the cofactor of the sum of the operation inside the parentheses.

_48_
2(9+3)

Or 48 * 1/2 * 1/12

Or 48 * 1/24

Or 48/24

Or 2

The whole basis for the mystification some people seem to feel when confronted with this expression is due to thinking that it could be "interpreted" several different ways. Given the notation that exists and absent the notation that would be required to yield an answer of 288, this is simply not possible. It's not something ambiguous like, "Woman without her man is lost."
628 posted on 04/14/2011 10:37:06 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 618 | View Replies ]


To: aruanan

Exactly.


630 posted on 04/14/2011 10:40:01 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (explosive bolts, ten thousand volts at a million miles an hour)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 628 | View Replies ]

To: aruanan
"First, 48÷2(9+3) is not an equation. "

The subject is the correct evaluation of the equation.

"1. there is nothing in the notation that indicates 2 is the sole divisor of the dividend 48"

Yes there is. The number 2, which is a dividend, is followed by a multiplication sign. Since that dividend is absolutely NOT contained in any parenthesis, the divisor of "48" is exactly "2".

"there is nothing in the notation that indicates (9+3) is not a cofactor of 2, only parentheses enclosing 48 and 2 could do that,"

Additional parenthesis enclosing the fraction "48/2" is redundant. They are not needed, as per above.

"the placing of the 2 next to the parentheses, in the absence of any operational sign, makes 2 the cofactor of the sum of the operation inside the parentheses."

Ridiculous. Arithmatic multiplication is not effected in any way by the manner in which it is indicated.

634 posted on 04/14/2011 10:54:16 AM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 628 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson