[dila813]

Here you go

http://www.angewandtebiologischeneuemedizin.com/en/index.php?title=Focardi-Rossi_Energy-Catalyzer

http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petroldragon

http://www.motherboard.tv/2011/1/25/is-cold-fusion-real-not-yet

http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/01/15/rossi-discovery-what-to-say/

[Windflier]

Quick comment....

I read the whole page at this link you provided:

http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/01/15/rossi-discovery-what-to-say/

and there isn't anything like universal condemnation being expressed by the scientists and researchers (as well as laymen) who have commented there.

If anything, I'd say the group mood is one of cautious skepticism, with a dose of bright optimism thrown in. I believe there's only one really negative comment on the whole page.

I urge you to read the whole thing. Most of the people commenting there, are very up on the science involved, and thoroughly familiar with the history of this, and similar developments.

I don't personally have enough information yet to know whether I'm looking at a real breakthrough or not. I remain open to seeing where this all leads.

[SatinDoll]

“...an alleged compact fusion reactor based on an assumed Cold Fusion technology...” and “...So far, attempts to replicate the experiment independently failed...”

Read more: http://www.angewandtebiologischeneuemedizin.com/en/index.php?title=Focardi-Rossi_Energy-Catalyzer#ixzz1J4E22pXq

Note: alleged and assumed.

http://www.angewandtebiologischeneuemedizin.com/en/index.php?title=Focardi-Rossi_Energy-Catalyzer#ixzz1J4CJWPOg

Look - I’m all for cold fusion if it can be duplicated.

It is called ‘proof’ when a process can be recreated over and over again with similar or identical results.

So far, it ain’t lookin’ good.