Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Tax-chick
Actually, he's right, the first Emperor who we call Augustus took the name Gaius Julius Caesar when he was adopted by Gaius Julius Caesar (our "julius Caesar") in 44 BC and then when he took the office of Princep took the name Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus . Augustus' birth name was Gaius Octavius Thurinus, his mother Atia was our Julius Caesar's niece.
17 posted on 04/07/2011 5:55:31 AM PDT by Cronos (OPC teaches covenant succession - their kids are saved regardless whether they are Christian or not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Cronos

Perhaps the writer is not a native English speaker. “Julius Caesar Augustus” isn’t found in common usage here.


22 posted on 04/07/2011 5:58:22 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Buy me a Land Shark and take me to Anguilla.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Cronos

I believe Princep (actually Princeps Senatus) was not an office but rather a title. It was of ancient republican heritage and was often given to the leading senator. It meant “first among the Senate” and carried no additional powers or authority beyond other offices the Princeps might hold. It was not dissimilar to our own President pro tem of the Senate, which is also largely honorific.

In the later imperial times it became one of the emperor’s titles (like emperor/imperator for that matter) despite its republican heritage. As such it eventually turned into the title Prince or its equivalent in all other European languages.

Augustus was also a title or honor, not an office.

For most of the time he was emperor Augustus held no particular office in the rather rickety Roman system of government. Rather he held a number of powers delegated to him by the Senate, as had previously been often done for other senators.

The sum total of these powers, in particular his absolute control of the army, gave him autocratic authority but this was concealed by their diffuse nature, so that during the first century or so of the Empire (called by historians the Principate) it was still in theory a Republic, not an Empire.


31 posted on 04/07/2011 6:10:34 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson