Jews on the Temple Mount?! Never! What’s next, Catholics at the Vatican!??
FREEP THIS POLL ***PING!*** FRmail me if you want to be added or removed from the Fearless Poll-Freeping Freepers Ping list. And be sure to ping me to any polls that need Freepin', if I miss them. (looks like a medium volume list) (gordongekko909, founder of the pinglist, stays on the list until his ghost signs up for the list)
That’s like saying are Mexicans allowed to eat in Mexican restaurants?
Duh...
The Pedophiles and Sissy’s at NY Daily News had to add this :Palin a failed GOP vice presidential candidate.
They should be allowed to put their temple back up and take that Muslim house of Satan down.
Oh fer cryin out loud!!! I didn’t like the way the yes was phrased. It is only a muzzie sacred site because they made it one, so they could have control over the area, or say in what happens there. Jerusalem isn’t even mentioned in the Koran.
Should Muslims be allowed?
Period.
Yes and as a side note - F* the Arabs who now refer to themselves as Palestinians.
and why do they never say "Hillary, a failed presidential candidate" Or "Obama, a former community organizer"...?
Done = 93% yes
Here’s a better idea: Israel nationalizes all holy sites.
It does this to eliminate the claims of any religion or nation to ownership of sovereign land in Israel other than embassies. Importantly, the government of Israel can then be quite liberal with its terms for “leased use” of such holy sites.
However, if a group currently leasing a site creates a public nuisance or engages in disruptive behavior, they might lose their lease, and the *administration* of that holy site would be turned over to someone else who is not pestiferous.
As an example, say the al-Asqa mosque is run by a Wahhabi faction that encourages a public riot. The Israelis could take away their rights to administer that mosque, and turn them over to, say, the Sufi sect of Islam, that of late has been more orderly and pacifist.
Even the suggestion of this would frighten the Wahhabi sect into incontinence. It is similar to the threat used by the Saud family of Saudi Arabia, when the Wahhabis who run half the country get too ambitious about displacing the Saud. The Saud just suggest that the Sufi might be better administrators than the Wahhabis. This shuts the hot heads right up.
So, what’s not to like? As sovereign Israeli property, the Israelis could declare that such holy sites are no longer “World Heritage Sites”, so they would no longer be immune from demolition if they became problematic to Israel.
This would clear the path for Israel, so that it could issue the threat that if ever again attacked by an Islamic nation, all Muslim holy sites in Israel would be permanently abolished. Razed, and rebuilt as Jewish holy sites.
“Al Aqsa Mosque” is just another Conquest Mosque, like the 9/11 Mosque in NYC. Bulldoze it. The Jews are back, and your Al Aqsa should be used as rubble under a pig farm.
Yes. It’s a sacred site to Jews and Muslims. 93%
No. Tensions are high enough already. Why fan more flames? 6%
I’m not sure. 1%
That fact that anyone even thinks of asking a question like this shows me that the end is nearer than we thought.
It’s their temple, it’s their city, it’s their country.
Kick the muzzies out and don’t worry about what the Jews should or should not be *allowed* to do on their own property!!!!
This is absolutely OUTRAGEOUS!!!!!!!!!!!
The fact that this is even a question tells us everything that we need to know about those on the other side.
Poll Results
Thank you for voting.
Should Jews be able to pray at Temple Mount?
Yes. It’s a sacred site to Jews and Muslims. 92%
No. Tensions are high enough already. Why fan more flames? 6%
I’m not sure. 1%
I don’t like the form of the question. The Mount belongs to Israel.