[omegadawn]

Jeffferson Davis ,President of the Confederacy was anti-slavary and the southern congress was already holding hearing on the abloishment of slavary when Lincoln attacked. Davis owned no slaves(adopted a young black man as his son). Neither did General Lee and the rest of the Confederate Generals whereas almost all of the Northern Generals owned slaves. Lincoln was a slave owner. Liberal historians try hide this by saying that the slaves were his wife's not his..

[K-Stater]

Jeffferson Davis ,President of the Confederacy was anti-slavary and the southern congress was already holding hearing on the abloishment of slavary when Lincoln attacked. Davis owned no slaves(adopted a young black man as his son). Neither did General Lee and the rest of the Confederate Generals whereas almost all of the Northern Generals owned slaves. Lincoln was a slave owner. Liberal historians try hide this by saying that the slaves were his wife's not his..

Incredible. There was not a single accurate statement in that entire paragraph. Usually you all manage to have at least one, even by accident. I think that qualifies you for entry in the League of the South Hall of Fame.

What the heck, if you're going to repeat your post I may as well repeat my response.

[rockrr]

No matter how many times you say it, it still isn’t so.

[ml/nj]

Lincoln was a slave owner. Liberal historians try hide this by saying that the slaves were his wife's not his..

I've never seen this asserted before. Do you have a reference? I don't even see when they might have had an opportunity to own slaves.

ML/NJ