To: RoadGumby
Man, this argument is classic.
1)
Hey! Look at how all these dogs are different!
This proves evolution is true [when you start from an evolutionary assumption]. (again, this is “equivocation”)
2)
Hey! Look at how all these dogs are different!
This proves that the dog kind was created with the capacity for huge variety [when you start from a creationist assumption].
The difference is that person two recognizes his own presupposed assumptions and he recognizes person one’s as well.
Person one doesn’t recognize that he has any presuppositions and concludes that his opponent is just an idiot for not seeing it his way.
117 posted on
02/10/2011 8:32:07 AM PST by
MrB
(Tagline suspended for important announcement on my home page. Click my handle.)
To: MrB
Man, this argument is classic.
1) Hey! Look at how all these dogs are different!
Man, this answer is even more classic. Hint: They're not all dogs (canids). Not even close. So it appears all those adaptations, which you have stated occur and explained (inasmuch as your dogma allows), have confused the biblical "kinds" classification.
It appears, through a juvenile experiment, that those adaptations, which you have stated occur, have happened to the point of speciation. I wonder how and why that happened?
128 posted on
02/10/2011 10:16:17 AM PST by
whattajoke
(Let's keep Conservatism real.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson