[ClearCase_guy]

First creationists say evolution has no place in modern science, predicts nothing, helps nothing.

I think you would be hard-pressed to find a Creationist who believed that. I do not believe in evolution -- but I recognize that it is the dominant paradigm in biology today. I don't want to force it out of the classroom. I don't want to force it out of the textbooks.

All I want is for discussions of science to include additional discussion from those of us who feel that evolution is a flawed theory.

It is the evolutionist who feel that counter-arguments have "no place in modern science". What you are engaged in, would be considered "projection" by a psychologist.

[decimon]

...evolution is a flawed theory.

I see evolution as a theory that has served us well but that will in time be superceded. Charles Darwin will be wrong in the sense that Isaac Newton was wrong.

[antiRepublicrat]

All I want is for discussions of science to include additional discussion from those of us who feel that evolution is a flawed theory.

All scientific theories are flawed or limited in some way.

It is the evolutionist who feel that counter-arguments have "no place in modern science".

Counter-arguments are fine, they've been going on for over 150 years, and evolution still stands as the dominant scientific theory.