How about 101 proofs ignored by our modern-day secular scientists in favor of radio-isotope dating and all it’s inherent flaws?
101 Evidences for a Young Age of the Earth...And the Universe
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2264681/posts
Don’t throw starlight into this argument either w/o fully understanding Einstein’s work or better yet reading Russell Humphrey’s book ‘Starlight and Time’ to better grasp the apparent age of starlight.
It’s very obvious you neither understand the math of physics or you would not post that kind of crap. The speed of light is fixed, and the distances to other stars and galaxies can be accurately determined. Face it, you cannot prove with consistent math that those galaxies are not up to several billion light years away from Earth, and that light has been traveling for that amount of time.
It’s very obvious you neither understand the math of physics or you would not post that kind of crap. The speed of light is fixed, and the distances to other stars and galaxies can be accurately determined. Face it, you cannot prove with consistent math that those galaxies are not up to several billion light years away from Earth, and that light has been traveling for that amount of time.
That thread you pointed to was just more of the same garbage of creationism’s “God made everything in 6 24 hour days” trying to pose as science I’ve seen posted here for the last few years.
You can try to blow off radioisotope dating, but then how do you explain nuclear physics of which this is an integral part? How can we make nuclear explosions and power plants work if it is not true? Again, you have absolutely no coherent and consistent explanation complete with the math. You cannot cherry pick which parts of physics you want to believe and which you will not accept, It is a unified whole that all fits together and gives an explanation of how the universe works that fits all of the observed data and has a consistent and coherent mathematical proof.