Replies

It’s very obvious you neither understand the math of physics or you would not post that kind of crap. The speed of light is fixed, and the distances to other stars and galaxies can be accurately determined. Face it, you cannot prove with consistent math that those galaxies are not up to several billion light years away from Earth, and that light has been traveling for that amount of time.

That thread you pointed to was just more of the same garbage of creationism’s “God made everything in 6 24 hour days” trying to pose as science I’ve seen posted here for the last few years.

You can try to blow off radioisotope dating, but then how do you explain nuclear physics of which this is an integral part? How can we make nuclear explosions and power plants work if it is not true? Again, you have absolutely no coherent and consistent explanation complete with the math. You cannot cherry pick which parts of physics you want to believe and which you will not accept, It is a unified whole that all fits together and gives an explanation of how the universe works that fits all of the observed data and has a consistent and coherent mathematical proof.

Every scientist I know, myself included, is a devoted Christian. The elegance of the design; the math, and physics, is not something that could be arbitrary. I find it strange that some people find it easier to believe that the evidence is mistaken, than it is to believe that a document written over 2000 years ago, has been interpreted and translated flawlessly.

I understand the math well enough to know that radio-isotope dating has certain assumptions inherent in it.

I understand it well enough to know that evolutionists would like to cover-up millions of year old anomolies w/ Mt. St. Helens to call them xenoliths (or some such) and claim that it doesn’t expose radio-isotope dating for the fraud that it is.

I understand Einstein’s work well enough to know the starlight shows apparent age now actual earth-days age.

I understand nuclear physics well enough to know that the power comes from splitting the uranium (or other radioactive) atoms rather than the radio-isotope decay rates for same.

I understand when modern day scientists calls something that can not be observed nor repeated ‘science’

I understand how to read and research both sides of an argument before I go spouting off and labeling others work as crap.

And I understand the math well enough to know that it disproves old-age evolution where you would need several orders of magnitude more than billions of years for evolution to NOT be a fairy-tale.

I understand how evolution can not explain the Cambrian explosion, polystrate fossils, thousands upon thousands of missing links, stasis in the fossil record, and more exposed and outright fraud than, not only any other branch of science, but more than all of the other branches of science combined.

Face it long ages evolution is toast just like global warming.

Ohhh

one more thing

I understand that true science does not cherry pick just the data that it needs to supoort a theory while discarding or defaming all the counter-evolutionary data.