Posted on 01/22/2011 9:44:26 AM PST by RobinMasters
(Jan. 22, 2011) Yesterday an article was published in the Honolulu Star Advertiser entitled Abercrombie Drops Quest for Obamas Birth Certificate written by an unnamed Associated Press writer. Here are my comments:
In an incredibly lame and cowardly anticlimactic announcement, hiding behind his spokeswoman Donalyn Dela Cruz, Abercrombies spokeswoman, in plain political defense, in the Hawaiian Sun Advertiser, said this:
There is nothing more that Gov. Abercrombie can do within the law to produce a document. Unfortunately, there are conspirators who will continue to question the citizenship of our president.
The Star Advertiser continues:
Abercrombie, who was a friend of Obamas parents and knew him as a child, launched an effort last month to find a way to dispel conspiracy theories that the president was born elsewhere. The governor said at the time he was bothered by people who questioned Obamas birthplace for political reasons.
But Abercrombies investigation reached a dead end when Louie told him the law restricted his options.
Here are several important points that need to be noted that only make the situation all the more suspicious to any reasonable person, Dela Cruzs Hillary Clinton-esque right-wing conspiracy defense notwithstanding:
1 - Bad political news is always dropped late Friday at the end of the news cycle in the hope that it will disappear from general view. The timing almost conclusively suggests that they do not see this as a win for themselves.
2 - Rush Limbaugh has officially, albeit belatedly, entered the debate full-throttle with the opening of his show this same day, highlighting the absurdity of the Abercrombie quest investigation. This must have been pretty alarming to the Obama camp, as Limbaughs embracing of the issue is likely to make it safe for many others outside of Limbaughs 20,000,000-person listenership to do the same.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
Schumer has long been a talking equine posterior.As a Congressman his campaign mainly targeted the elderly who he told: “Vote for me or they’ll take away your Social Security..”
I prefer to look at it this way: You aren’t going to boot him with a birther argument. There ARE ways to remove him from office legally—ways that will WORK.
The birther argument isn’t the way.
Thanks bitt.
Dont u think its possible 0’s people could have has enough on hil to blackmail her into being quiet?
It is also possible Ann didn’t know who the father was!
You keep moving your goalposts:
“You or I would end up being rejected like the unknowns who have sued Obama thus far. The birther issue needs a big name, political star to take the lead and seek the subpoena.”
- jamese777
Now I understand why Glenn Beck said that birthers are “just about the dumbest thing I ever heard.”.
Abercrombie was trying to back up the words of those Hawaii Republicans and failed miserably. Do you not understand that??
Here’s how Abercrombie’s efforts are playing with conservatives in Hawaii:
http://www.hawaiifreepress.com/main/ArticlesMain/tabid/56/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/3565/Governor-Babblecrombie-does-it-again-Open-mouth-insert-birther.aspx
I didn't say anything about a civil trial. I quoted YOU directly. Did your Mommy tell you to ignore that these were your own words??
What am I supposed to be looking at?? This story doesn't exonerate Abercrombie's failures. This story doesn't say that Obama was definitely born in Hawaii either. It praises Lingle for trying to keep out the controversy, although it's not accurate because it ignores the July 2009 statement by Fukino and the radio interview you used to quote before I debunked your reason for doing so.
As much as a bad Dog and Pony can be called staged.
We all know that's a lie. I told you straight out that I wasn't "demanding" anything. I am simply asking the question "Why are all these documents hidden?" It's right there at the top of my post.
Do you always twist the truth?
I’m sorry that I used the word “demand”. I gave you credit for more spine then seems to exist. A question though, if your not “demanding” to see these records, how do you know that he is refusing to release them.
Based on what? My challenging you directly on your twisting of my words?
A question though, if your not demanding to see these records, how do you know that he is refusing to release them.
You can't possibly be that dumb.
If Obama has great grammar school grades, a good SAT and LSAT (what’s the chance of a great LSAT from a Harvard Law Grad) and he released these records without being asked, would you be cheering him as being open, or would you say he is bragging. Like I said, a politician or anyone else would be nuts to give into to your non-demands.
Like I also said, the Founding Fathers had an idea about privacy when they preserved privacy for us all with the 4th Amendment.
You are definitely a lefty. LOL
No, the Constitution and logical, consistent reasoning qualifies as conservative in my neck of the woods.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.