Response: Then we can say that soldiers that bugger together stay together.
Actually...this will backfire on the homosexuals. If the draft is ever reinstated the little pansies won’t be able to weasel out of service by proclaiming they are gay!
Where is the Barf Alert with additional Projectile Vomit warning?
LMAO!!!
The URL of this elite leftist drivel propaganda piece says all there is to say. These idiots equate homosexual sex with intellect? Promoting disease and self destructive disorder with being intellectual?
I’m against homosexuals joining the military, but I don’t think it’ll be that big of an issue.
Regardless of the lie of 10%, less than 2% of the population is gay.
And it’s not like there’s huge numbers of lavender guys and gals lining up at the recruitment centers waiting to get fabulous in the military.
But what I am and have always been concerned with is women in the military.
They not represent 20% of the military as a whole.
You want unit cohesion and discipline problems? Shove a bunch of 18-20 year old men and women together and see where that gets you. Like nature is not going to take its course?
And have you any idea the problems encountered with military personnel from the same unit being married to each other or worse “cohabitating”?
Or the problems when military personnel cheat on their spouse with other military personnel.
Or women getting pregnant in the middle of their tours.
The problems go on and on and on.
So if you’re really concerned about the state of military effectiveness, you should also be against women in the military.
The only way to be sure is to compare the military performance of a unit of exclusively-homosexual troops to that of a unit of exclusively-heterosexual ones.
The only way that Homosexuals will improve the military is if they are all assigned duties like “probing for land mines”, “dud testers for EOD”, “Checking if sharks are in bodies of water”, “Cleaning up nuclear wastes”, and other jobs where we don’t want to risk regular soldiers.
A brigade of lesbians who’s cycles have synced all PMSing at once... that would be a brigade to stay the hell out of the way of.
Sure, people who have mental and emotional disorders make better soldiers.
Right.
And it's not only the scumbag Democrats who feel this way. Throw in a handful of Republicans as well:
Here is the list of GOP faggots, for ready reference:
1. Lisa Murkowski (R - Alaska)
2. Mark Kirk (R - Illinois)
3. Susan Collins (R - Maine)
4. Olympia Snowe (R - Maine)
5. Scott Brown (R - Massachusetts)
6. John Ensign (R - Nevada)
7. Richard Burr (R - North Carolina)
8. George Voinovich (R - Ohio)
Also, Senator-elect Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania stated prior to the vote that he supports sodomizing the American military. Every one of these sick scumbags must be defeated.
Wow!!! Didn’t see this coming! /s
Being that there is a disproportionate amount of homosexual serial killers, and that violence plays a big part in the homosexual lifestyle, would might argue that homosexuals would make good soldiers.
Being that homosexuals choose a lifestyle that goes against the laws of God, it goes without saying that homosexuals are atheists. When you “unleash” atheists who often times are psychopatic when it comes to violence into a military environment, the chances of atrocities against innocent civilians (or even enemy soldiers that have surrendered in battle) are greater.
Of course the prostitute mainstream media would never report that the atrocities committed were by homosexual soldiers; the “black mark” would be placed on the US military in general.
As shown in “The Pink Swastika”, the homosexuals under Hitler’s command did some pretty gruesome things.
http://www.thepinkswastika.com/5294/index.html
Why haven't we actually seen these "large majorities?" Only 25% answered the survey, and most of them weren't enlisted, frontline troops.
so they will have more story telling skills instead of blowing up and killing people skills?
Then again traitors to the enemy must tell a good story. see wikileaks etc.