Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Insto-History of US Politics:

To a Christian concept of good and evil is untainted. The economic impact on such a shift in morality’s gravitational pull can be charted in the US economy. Liberals only failed twice. Hitler exposed their eugenics philosophy as evil, and JFK stared down their close relationship with the KKK [although Clinton’s eulogy of Senator Byrd was disturbing].

Otherwise liberalism [aka ‘progressivism’] has ultimately triumphed in every front ever since Herbert Hoover meddled with the Harding boom years. And prior to Harding, it was progressive meddling that led to Teddy Roosevelt’s economic ‘panic’ and Woodrow Wilson’s economic ‘panic’.

Our nation’s Chistian principles are the foundation of all great moments in US history, and this has been one of the world’s best friends of the Jewish faith as well. Lately the US voters have supported voters who ‘booed’ God [note the DNC convention of 2012], reelected a man who mocked Christians [the ‘Bitter Clinger’ quote], and supported anti-semites and anti-zionists in politics. [Note the blessing and curse of treatment toward Abraham’s descendents: .] Perhaps worse, we have voters who are cavalier about tax money funding ‘art’ that mocks Him.


2,279 posted on 10/07/2016 1:41:42 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2278 | View Replies ]


A lesson from the yacht tax [Nealz Nuze, 2011]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3477285/posts

http://www.wsbradio.com/weblogs/nealz-nuze/2011/jun/30/lesson-yacht-tax ^ | Neal Boortz

The current demonization of jets is eerily similar to the demonization of yacht owners in the early 1990s. Back in 1990, George (read my lips, no new taxes) H. W. Bush passed a budget, which included a “luxury tax” on yachts over $100,000 in addition to jewelry, furs, etc. At the time, the Joint Committee on Taxation believed that in 1991 it would be able to rack up $31 million from these luxury taxes. What was reality? They collected just $16 million. Oops. You see, people changed their behavior in response to new tax laws. Duhhhhhh. And then what do you know! These new taxes had an effect on the economy. George Will explains the economic consequences of this luxury tax:

According to a study done for the Joint Economic Committee, the tax destroyed 330 jobs in jewelry manufacturing, 1,470 in the aircraft industry and 7,600 in the boating industry. The job losses cost the government a total of $24.2 million in unemployment benefits and lost income tax revenues. So the net effect of the taxes was a loss of $7.6 million in fiscal 1991, which means the government projection was off by $38.6 million.

Yes -— when the screams of those who had lost their jobs were heard, and the failure of the new taxes to generate revenue was recognized, the taxes were repealed. Trouble is, the yacht building that had flown overseas as a result of the tax never really returned. But that’s OK, I guess -— because only rich people buy yachts, right? Corporate CEOs and people like that. So screw them. If middle class people lose jobs in shipyards -— well then that’s the price we just have to pay.

Neal Boortz


2,280 posted on 10/07/2016 1:42:22 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2279 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson