Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv

I thought the plan was to transport the H3 back to earth, use it here and transport the generated electricity in the usual way. It’s low mass fuel, and the moon’s weak gravity wouldn’t be a barrier to transport. The concept of microwaving the energy to earth comes from a different paradigm - having orbiting solar generating stations, in which you would need some way to wirelessly transmit the energy to earth.

And while the downlink area might not be dangerous, and further might not be heating the world, or causing environmental harm - there’s not a shred of doubt in my mind that the envirowackos would claim that it did do all those things.


22 posted on 11/27/2010 9:56:07 AM PST by eclecticEel (Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness: 7/4/1776 - 3/21/2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: eclecticEel; SunkenCiv
Mining of H3 on the moon is a major part of this movie. Not really about energy production, a bit heavyhanded against corporations, and a bit slow at times, it is still worth a view if you have Netflix or can rent it cheap:


32 posted on 11/27/2010 1:01:58 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: eclecticEel

It might be very economical to bring the H3 back from the Moon; the sample return vehicle wouldn’t have to be manned. The problem remains that no one has demonstrated feasibility of controlled fusion. Without that, the H3 may as well stay where it is.


35 posted on 11/27/2010 1:28:09 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson