They were not under obligation to discuss it in the Elg case either, but they did. The Elg case is 40 years AFTER WKA & thus does set precedent regarding the citizenship of the parents in regards to A2S1C5.
“They were not under obligation to discuss it in the Elg case either, but they did”
That ranks up there with saying Obama’s ineligible because he hasn’t produced his birth certificate. It’s non-evidence, nothing more. Whatever extraneous affirmations they made in the Elg case has no bearing on the extraneous affirmations they didn’t make in the Ark case.