“They were not under obligation to discuss it in the Elg case either, but they did”
That ranks up there with saying Obama’s ineligible because he hasn’t produced his birth certificate. It’s non-evidence, nothing more. Whatever extraneous affirmations they made in the Elg case has no bearing on the extraneous affirmations they didn’t make in the Ark case.
Yes, you like to post trivial crap but won’t respond to actual references to natural law by distinguished Englishmen & the US Congress & census records. You are all the same...you can handle debating the truth. You always cut & run because you can not come back with equally substantial proof to refute it.
FYI...WKA has no bearing on natural born either as the court never declared WKA to be natural born. PERIOD