Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Pessimist; Swordmaker
> So the defense is to state that the accusation is factually correct, but then try to spin it?

No spin. You can do simple arithmetic. Having glass on two sides rather than one presents twice as much chance of something breaking:

3GS = 2.1% cracked the front glass

4 = 3.9% cracked either the front glass or the rear glass

So to me, that sounds about right. Twice as much opportunity for something to break, and twice as many breaks.

I fail to see the big deal in these stats.

That's of course a different question from the technical issue of whether having glass on both sides was a good idea.

6 posted on 10/13/2010 10:41:18 AM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: dayglored
>>>That's of course a different question from the technical issue of whether having glass on both sides was a good idea.<<<

I think that is the point. Putting glass on both sides doubles the chances of cracked glass. While it might look nice, IMHO, it was a poor design.

Of course, Apple fans seem to prioritize “coolness” over functionality and practicality, so for Apple's target market, the dual glass design might be a plus.

I don't mean that as a knock on Apple fans, just an observation. A more durable, but less esthetically pleasing device is not necessarily superior. It is a matter of preference.

11 posted on 10/13/2010 11:22:25 AM PDT by Above My Pay Grade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson