Shocking revelation: Former Air Force personnel disclose UFO, alien-related threats

NECN ^

[marbren]

(NECN: Washington) - A press conference was held this afternoon at the National Press Club in Washington, where at least a dozen former U.S. Air Force personnel, mostly officers who worked on secret projects connected to sensitive nuclear weapons sites, are admitting that they were privy to UFO and alien-related incidents -- that occurred during their time of service.

In this clip, you will hear from: Retired Air Force Captain Robert Salas, Former Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Dwayne Arneson and Former Air Force Official Bill Jameson

[The Comedian]

I like the plain text personally. It adds more gravitas.

Of course, this is advice from a guy who puts a masked vigilante in every post.

Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

[Quix]

Wellllllllllllll raspberries to you too! LOL.

I’m not sure . . . gravitas . . . is going to be the most desperate need. LOL.

Your pick makes finding your posts easy.

[Library Lady]

Plain text is so much easier for me to read. It doesn’t matter which comes first. I’ll just read the easy one.
Thanks.

[wolfcreek]

I wish had had pics/vids and further explain *how* he attempted to communicate with them.

The vagueness blurs the competency of his statements..

[jackv]

Thank you, so much, Quix!!
Blessings!! :o)

[RebelTex]

Thank you.

[Lima_Two_Zero_Alpha]

What is this Quixicated version about which you speak?

[Quix]

Much appreciate you letting me know.

[Quix]

I don’t find this overly vague:

---

During this lengthy flight a very strange event occurred that even had crewman Dr. Story Musgrave unable to explain what he observed from the shuttle windows.

A large disc shaped object appeared below the Columbia. The shuttle was approximately, 190 Nautical miles high.

The disc was first observed to miraculously appear from out of nowhere, flying through the clouds below and progressing from right to left as the astronauts stared in utter amazement. The outer rim of the craft appeared to be rotating counter-clockwise. It was very large (compared to common space junk and breakaway ice), approximately 50 to 150 feet in diameter.

---

I think the other was for public consumption . . . moderating the trouble he’d be in otherwise.

[Quix]

QUIXICATED
version 2nd, below.

The

--special fonts such as This one--papyrus--[below]

--special colors

--most such bolded

--special indentations--though I often do those in plain text, too. Maybe no choice on those.

Short--journalistic style paragraphing.

in short--the way I most enjoy posting on a text based communication medium where there's no tone of voice, no cadence difference, no raised eyebrows or smiles or frowns with voice tones; no volume differences etc.

Therefore, I tend to use everything I can for variety, for fun--I just enjoy playing with words in part--and for emphases. It's kind of funny, I rarely use emoticons. I'd rather use words in emotional ways. Legatus has a link to a great TEXT thing that's kind of smack in the middle of my seDiments. I saved the link . . . now where'd I save it.

It's kind of funny, I rarely use emoticons. I'd rather use words in emotional ways. Legatus has a link to a great STEPHEN FRY TEXT--KINETIC TYPOGRAPHY video thing that's kind of smack in the middle of my seDiments. I saved the link . . . now where'd I save it.

Here's the youtube I found . . .
Which, Legatus, I still really Love.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7E-aoXLZGY

Here's the larger LONNNNNNG essay it's taken from--ONLY language addicts should bother:

http://www.stephenfry.com/2008/11/04/dont-mind-your-language%E2%80%A6/

Quixicated above:

The

--special fonts such as This one

--special colors

--most such bolded

--special indentations--though I

OFTEN
do those
in plain text, too.
Maybe there's no choice on those.

Short--journalistic style paragraphing.

in short--the way I most enjoy posting on a text based communication medium where there's

1. no tone of voice,
2. no cadence difference,
3. no raised eyebrows
4. no smiles
5. no frowns with voice tones;
6. no volume differences etc.

Therefore, I tend to use everything I can for variety for fun--I just enjoy playing with words, in part,

and for
emphasis!

It's kind of funny, I rarely use emoticons. I'd rather use words in emotional ways. Legatus has a link to a great STEPHEN FRY TEXT--KINETIC TYPOGRAPHY video thing that's kind of smack in the middle of my seDiments. I saved the link . . . now where'd I save it.

Here's the youtube I found . . .
Which, Legatus, I still really love.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7E-aoXLZGY

Here's the larger essay it's taken from:

http://www.stephenfry.com/2008/11/04/dont-mind-your-language%E2%80%A6/

[Bookwoman]

I like the Quixicated versions - put them first!

[InternetTuffGuy]

Democratic Underground and similar sorts of folks.

Libs use the same Delphi technique against non-obama-cultists that the press uses against anybody claiming to have witnessed a UFO.

Don't sweat it. Thanks for keeping the thread going.

[SonOfDarkSkies]

I like the plain text personally. It adds more gravitas.

Of course, this is advice from a guy who puts a masked vigilante in every post.

I agree with our old friend "The Comedian"...the plain text is so much easier on the eyes and it does add gravitas.

But, of course, I only insert a naked, invisible bipolar in each of my posts.;-)

[Quix]

Thanks for the bother of your reply

and particularly for your kind words.

I suspect many who prefer the Quixicated versions are not all that interested in replying. We shall see.

[Quix]

Hmmmmmm.

Not sure if a Son of DARK SKIES . . .

has a convincing platform to voice such an opinion on.

I mean . . . DARK SKIES??? . . . DARTH VADER SKIES? DARK SIDE SKIES? NOT LIGHT SKIES?

Goodness.

/joking

[Quix]

THANKS THANKS.

Much appreciate your noting the truth about such strategies and tactics.

[Quix]

GLEANINGS FROM VARIOUS . . .

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread565716/pg1

ORIGINAL source seems impossible to load for some reason from

http://www.unknowncountry.com

The implant that was removed from "John Smith" last year was not made of materials that are available on earth. To be specific, certain of the isotopes of the metallic components of the object do not have the same ratios as isotopes found on this planet.

There has been an excellent study of the object done at the highest level of scientific professionalism. At present, we are trying to obtain a version of the study that does not contain any way of identifying the scientist who did it or the labs where it was done.

It is pitiful and an outrage that this should be necessary but, in fact, if his name was known his career would be in jeopardy, and the labs might face serious consequences for the work they did.

In fact, a number of the objects Bill studied were completely inexplicable. The implant that is in my left ear has been found to be a piece of biotechnology that operates by totally unknown means. And this new object removed from "John Smith" is extraordinarily sophisticated. It is probably a communications device, and if Dr. Robert Koontz, who discusses it on Dreamland is correct in his analysis, it is a very powerful one.

But no established scientific institution would even consider looking at the analysis, no matter how impeccable it is. And yet, the presence of these things in our bodies is obviously of absolutely central importance.

.
.
.

50 surgeries on UFO implants video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtKb6uVRRPc

case reported on a physical scientist for the 15th case.

2nd toe of left foot . . . X-Rays showed a metalic foreign body. Thickness of a pencil led . . . 8-9 which all looked the same and had essentially the same qualities.

Double blind study sent to labs--no info on where they came from sent to the labs. Came back with the conclusion that these are meteiorite like samples.

3-5mm radio dense . . . insertion 28 Feb 2008 as individual remembers waking up in the morning and saw a couple of drops of blood on the bedsheet and noticed a couple of puncture wounds on his toe which healed rapidly.

On of the cases we did was emminating a radio frequency . . . that frequency was broadcasting on a deep space radio frequency. We have emmisssions coming from this last case, too. Magnetic field of 10 milligause

emitted RF radiation at 14.749650 MHz. Also emitted RF in ELF and microwave bands.

http://www.alienscalpel.com

.
.
.

Jamie Maussan: Amazing UFO Footage from Mexico:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZ-VtDL73dw&NR=1

"We can see a change of an agenda--from very far--to very near--this is happening around the world."

"I believe we are very close to having a very open demonstration by these creatures."

about 20 miles from Houston Texas . . . April 11 . . . changed his life forever . . . was in the garden of his home when suddenly he had an encounter with a very large UFO craft . . .

. . . we believe that after 2006 . . . a new era has started . . . space images . . . a crash between Cosmos 2251 and irridium 53 . . . the orbits are always steady . . . they haven't been able to explain the why of this crash . . . An object stopped the Atlantis from coming back--for 8-11 hours. That had to be a warning. That was not accidental. The message must have been that space doesn't belong to humans but to all sentient beings.

. . . it happened again STS 116 . . . these objects got very close to the Space STation.

We have shown these in the past. We want to prove that we have been watched in the past. . . . Discovery landing . . . a UFO got very close to it . . . [video shows it] . . .

Santiago: Mission 123 . . . [end of that video. Not sure where continuation video is]

STANTON FRIEDMAN:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sn8OIkYwAro&feature=channel

. . . BEEN TRYING TO PROVIDE people with a serious position like you . . . ammunition to deal with the noisey negativists . . .

SOME UFO's are alien spacecraft.

. . . none of their [noisey negativists] arguments stand up.

. . . Some people object to the notion to having flying saucers and science in the same sentence. . . . science about problem solving . . . it isn't the art of proclamation.

4 problems I have with the noisey negativists. Their 4 basic rules are totally incompatible with science.

1. What public doesn't know. I'm not going to tell them. 2. Don't bother me with the facts. My mind's made up. 3.If you can't attack the data--attack the people. It's a lot easier and nobody'll know the difference anyway. 4. Do your research by proclamation. Investigation is too much trouble and nobody will know the difference anyway.

[Enough for now . . .]

[SonOfDarkSkies]

My original name, Dark Skies, was/is a reference to Churchill's Gathering Storm, but most folks think I'm just trying to say I'm depressed.;-)

[AU72]

Not a smoking gun, a smoking cannon.

[wolfcreek]

*Preparation*?

http://www.iamrogue.com/skyline?__source=msn|alien+encounter|Aliens|M_Skyline_Related&sky=msn|alien+encounter|Aliens|M_Skyline_Related