Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Einstein's Relativity Affects Aging on Earth (Slightly)
nationalgeographic ^ | September 23, 2010 | Ker Than

Posted on 09/26/2010 2:54:10 PM PDT by JoeProBono

Like a vignette from The Twilight Zone, new research shows that you'll age slightly faster standing on a staircase than you do on the floor below.

The finding is linked to the strange, time-bending effects of Albert Einstein's theories of relativity, which for the first time have been shown to affect earthbound distances and time frames.

(Related: "Einstein's Gravity Confirmed on a Cosmic Scale.")

Specifically, Einstein's special theory of relativity predicts that time does not flow at a steady rate, and it can be affected by acceleration. As a result, a clock speeding away from an observer will appear to tick slower than a stationary clock.

This theory is the basis of a famous thought experiment known as the twin paradox, in which a twin sibling who travels on a fast-moving rocket ship would return home younger than the other twin.

The equations of relativity also predict that gravity similarly slows down, or dilates, time.

"So if you are experiencing stronger gravitational pull, then your time is going to go slower," said study co-author James Chin-Wen Chou of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Atomic Clocks Show Gravity Slowing Time

The time-slowing effects of acceleration and gravity have been demonstrated in experiments that compare real clocks on Earth's surface with timepieces in high-flying spacecraft and satellites, such as ones used for global positioning systems.

(Related: "Every Black Hole Contains Another Universe?")

But the new study, appearing in this week's issue of the journal Science, shows that these effects are also measurable here on Earth's surface.

The pull of gravity on an object increases closer to the center of mass, so an object on Earth's surface actually experiences a slightly stronger pull than one floating in the atmosphere.

Using two ultraprecise atomic clocks, Chou and colleagues showed that lifting one clock by only about a foot (33 centimeters) above the other creates enough of a gravitational difference that the higher clock ticks slightly faster.

In a second experiment, the team measured the effects of relativity on the time-keeping aluminum atoms inside the clocks.

Atomic clocks work based on the number of vibrations an electrically charged atom experiences as it moves between two energy levels. For the clocks used in the experiments, one second is equal to more than a million billion vibrations.

In one of the clocks, the team nudged the normally stationary aluminum atom so that it gyrated back and forth as it vibrated. As Einstein predicted, the clock with the moving atom ticked at a slightly slower rate than the second clock.

Before anyone rushes to lower elevations, though, the NIST scientists note that these effects are much too small for humans to perceive directly—adding up to approximately 90 billionths of a second over a 79-year lifetime.

"It's not a road to youth," said Daniel Kleppner, a physicist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who was not involved in the study.


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

A winding staircase in Austria's Melk Abbey (file photo).


1 posted on 09/26/2010 2:54:12 PM PDT by JoeProBono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

I knew a one story house was a good idea.


2 posted on 09/26/2010 2:55:18 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Unfortunately this means that Michael Moore is practically eternal.


3 posted on 09/26/2010 2:57:54 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Dumbacrates are already hard at work on a way to tax that 90 billionths of a second.


4 posted on 09/26/2010 2:59:39 PM PDT by jimpick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jimpick
Dumbacrates are already hard at work on a way to tax that 90 billionths of a second.

Yes, but only in the Time Illusion we live in - four seconds behind us (wrong to think linear but it helps with the sentence ) Republicans have been in charge for the last few decades... no new taxes in that dimension.

5 posted on 09/26/2010 3:03:47 PM PDT by GOPJ (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2589165/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
(Related: "Every Black Hole Contains Another Universe?")...

Always being the one to have to disillusion the feeble-minded is a dirty and thankless job, but somebody's gotta do it.

Relativity is a bunch of BS, black holes are a bunch of BS, the "Bit Bang(TM)" is a bunch of BS, and the one universe which we observe and live in is the only one that there is. Relativity was based entirely on thought experiments and not on any sort of real evidence. Thought experiments are not a rational basis for physics.

6 posted on 09/26/2010 3:12:26 PM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

I’ve always been one to advocate that God creating the universe, etc. in such a short span of time, is explainable by Einstein’s theory of relativity—haha!


7 posted on 09/26/2010 3:28:41 PM PDT by swatbuznik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

So, all you people living at higher altitudes won’t live as long as the rest of us near sea level (relatively speaking that is :). You’ll grow older and grayer faster. Guess that makes places like Denver, the mile-high city, a death trap :).


8 posted on 09/26/2010 3:37:58 PM PDT by MCH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MCH

9 posted on 09/26/2010 3:40:56 PM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
Einstein's Relative [mother-in-law] Affected His Aging on Earth (Not Slightly)

Like a vignette from The Twilight Zone, new research shows that you'll age much faster standing on your mother-in-law`s staircase than you would in your own house.

10 posted on 09/26/2010 3:49:57 PM PDT by bunkerhill7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946
Relativity was based entirely on thought experiments and not on any sort of real evidence. Thought experiments are not a rational basis for physics.

So how do you explain the physical evidence of clocks measuring slower time at high rates of speed and altitude? Clocks in orbit have to be recalibrated on a regular basis to keep them synchronized with clocks on earth.
11 posted on 09/26/2010 3:56:29 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Some of the longest living people on Earth live at high altitudes.


12 posted on 09/26/2010 4:01:18 PM PDT by wolfcreek (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7

13 posted on 09/26/2010 4:01:31 PM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Who knew Helen Thomas spent her formative years in Nepal?


14 posted on 09/26/2010 4:05:20 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Live jubtabulously!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7

Agnes Moorehead as the old woman in The Twilight Zone episode The Invaders


15 posted on 09/26/2010 4:08:39 PM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

That says there’s still an opening in the world for somebody who can build more accurate clocks. There’s money to be made in things like that.


16 posted on 09/26/2010 4:38:34 PM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: swatbuznik
I’ve always been one to advocate that God creating the universe, etc. in such a short span of time, is explainable by Einstein’s theory of relativity—haha!

If time is a measurable property of the universe, and that universe is a creation of God, then time itself is part of the creation. In other words, before the universe, there was no time.

After the universe was created, God set it on a continuous ever-changing course, with "time" thrown into the mix. For God to create the universe, he didn't need time the way we measure it. In the beginning, there was no time, and if there was no time, then everything that we know and can see and can measure, was created in "no time at all". Thus, the big bang is unnecessary in order to explain the vastness of the universe.
17 posted on 09/26/2010 4:44:38 PM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
The most spectacular demonstration of relativistic physics is provided by synchrotrons, of which the celebrated LHC is an example. These accelerate particles to kinetic energies which correspond to speeds hundreds and even thousands of times the speed of light, using the classical formula, 1/2 mv2. Of course, the operation of the synchrotron depends critically on synchronising the accelerating fields in time with the speed of the particles around the ring, so there can be no doubt that they do in fact approach the limiting speed of light without exceeding it.
18 posted on 09/26/2010 4:52:07 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: swatbuznik
I’ve always been one to advocate that God creating the universe, etc. in such a short span of time, is explainable by Einstein’s theory of relativity—haha!

Russell Humphreys proposed a model which incorporated the Theory of Relativity to explain how a 'thousands of years old universe' and a 'billions of year old universe' were not incompatible (it took the effects of gravity on time, and the 'relative' position of the time observer).

An article is here:

Starlight and Time Article

And a post to the book is here: Starlight and Time

19 posted on 09/26/2010 5:20:09 PM PDT by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew

So many of the things that people who don’t pay attention are calling fantasy or pure mental exercises are elegantly demonstrated in the physical world.

Einstein’s theory about gravity bending space sent scientists scrambling to photograph an eclipse. In the end it was proven when stars behind the sun were photographed during an eclipse. Today astronomy commonly uses gravitational lensing to see even deeper into space.

There’s plenty of theoretical science that hasn’t been proven or possibly can’t be proven but there’s plenty that has been proven as in the case of clocks.


20 posted on 09/26/2010 5:33:28 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson