Where and when did I ever say anything about the AMI building being in the news after 9/11? Is that how you treat facts? You just ignore them and make stuff up?
I wrote, "The fact that the 9/11 terrorists took flight training in Lantana, Florida was in the news BEFORE the letters were mailed."
So, I gather that you believe that al Qaeda terrorists sent all the other letters, but they did NOT send any letter to the National Enquirer. All that contamination was carried into the AMI building via rent money? And that makes sense to you?
The landlord did NOT work for AMI. The landlord's HUSBAND worked for AMI. So, why would the money be taken to AMI? Is it because that's the only way you can make your theory work?
Did al Qaeda travel to all the post office facilities between New Jersey and Florida to sprinkle around anthrax just to fool the Postal Inspectors? Is that your theory? Yet, they left no anthrax in the rooms where they stayed?
You don't just have holes in your theory, your theory is nothing but holes.
Yes.
"The landlord did NOT work for AMI. The landlord's HUSBAND worked for AMI. So, why would the money be taken to AMI?"- EdLake
Because cash changes hands in that manner. Had you ever "followed a Dollar" then you'd know the same.
The 9/11 terrorists *specifically* went from Florida, where they rented their apartment from the wife of an AMI employee, to New Jersey, and then to Boston where they boarded their fateful jets on 9/11/2001.
In other words, their travel dovetails *precisely* with where the anthrax letters were mailed, and with where they paid their rent money.