1 posted on
09/16/2010 3:36:00 AM PDT by
decimon
To: SunkenCiv
2 posted on
09/16/2010 3:36:37 AM PDT by
decimon
To: decimon
So, what’s the consensus on the 6,000-year human existence model?
To: decimon
4 posted on
09/16/2010 3:47:07 AM PDT by
Westbrook
(Having children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
To: decimon
I though this was about some form of internet dating I hadn’t heard of.
5 posted on
09/16/2010 3:47:53 AM PDT by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
To: decimon
Bumping for later because I have to run.
That said IMO it's not so much a problem in the variation of radioactive decay but a possible variance in Time itself, especially at different points across the universe.
11 posted on
09/16/2010 4:05:16 AM PDT by
prisoner6
(Right Wing Nuts are holding The Constitution together as the Loose Screws of The Left come undone!)
To: decimon
13 posted on
09/16/2010 5:17:18 AM PDT by
Tax-chick
("A litte plain food, and a philosophic temperament, are the only necessities of life."~W. Churchill)
To: decimon
Oh please. They aren't even mentioning or interacting with the issues. This is pathetic propaganda. It's like watching flat-earthers focus myopically on their flat yard lawns.
C-14 and other radioisotope dating techniques now provide more evidence for a young earth than an old one. It's now the old-earthers that are forever excusing the results and crying 'contamination' and so forth because they can't accept the raw data. Let's stop the pretense that they believe in 'science.'
14 posted on
09/16/2010 5:41:35 AM PDT by
Liberty1970
(http://www.caringbridge.org/visit/lydiablievernicht)
To: decimon
"The maximum neutrino flux in the sample in their experiments was several times greater than the flux of neutrinos from the sun. The researchers followed the gamma-ray emission rate of each source for several weeks and found no difference between the decay rate of the spheres and the corresponding foils."
This probably rules out neutrinos as any sort of cause, so scientists need to think very carefully about what other factors change during a huge solar flare. Because there aren't any other obvious factors, this seems to point to the involvement of an as-yet-undiscovered force, particle, or type of energy. Exciting (or maybe frustrating) time to be a physicist.

"Fascinating"
To: decimon; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; 31R1O; ...
28 posted on
09/16/2010 7:39:02 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson