Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bgill

I have to admit that I didn’t know if you needed a rooster for a chicken to lay an egg. I suspect many there didn’t know either...so kept the rooster thinking it was needed.

Tyrone was right. Immediate gratification instead of thinking long term.


179 posted on 10/13/2010 6:48:32 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]


To: RummyChick
I have to admit that I didn’t know if you needed a rooster for a chicken to lay an egg. I suspect many there didn’t know either...so kept the rooster thinking it was needed.

Who told you that?!? No, hens lay eggs because that's what they do - with or without a rooster. You only need a rooster if you want the eggs fertilized. Same as in humans - females produce eggs, males are needed to make the next generation. So, boil the rooster and save the hens for their eggs. FYI, at one time I was raising over 100 chickens.

I didn't notice if they boiled or roasted the hen. Boiling would save more of the nutrients and fat. Roasting lets the juices and fats drip into the fire.

Also, they should have had someone pick the meat and skin off the bones and divide it out evenly AFTER the TC. The bones should have been saved to boil again for the broth to make double duty out of it. Did they have rice? Cook the rice in it - yum. Add the feet, as well. Also, break the bones so the marrow can be sucked out. For triple duty, fish with the bones and head. Perhaps fashion a fish hook or fly.

183 posted on 10/14/2010 9:35:04 PM PDT by bgill (K Parliament- how could a young man born in Kenya who is not even a native American become the POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson