Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: eleni121

How would Americans back them have dealt with the radical islam problem we see today? I’m posing the question seriously.


5 posted on 09/09/2010 10:15:55 AM PDT by utherdoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: utherdoul
How would Americans back them have dealt with the radical islam problem we see today? I’m posing the question seriously

They were a bit before the "progressive" 1920's but look into the barbary coast wars

7 posted on 09/09/2010 10:20:49 AM PDT by Cowman (How can the IRS seize property without a warrant if the 4th amendment still stands?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: utherdoul
Americans and Islam-—a relationship more comforting to Muslims than not -—not much to commend there I am sad to say.

Except for the Barbary Coast Wars which happened as a direct assault upon American interests—the US has tended to avoid any entanglements with any goal of the protection of Christians from Islamic terror.

In fact, the opposite is more true: the US has repeatedly attacked Christians when they have been threatened and attacked by Muslims. The most recent examples are in Cyprus, Kosovo and Bosnia.

When the genocide of 4 million Christians in Asia Minor occur ed between around 1900-1923 - the US did next to nothing. A terrible stain on the US. Just as we did nothing when the genocide against Southern Sudanese was occurring. 3 million dead there.

9 posted on 09/09/2010 11:18:06 AM PDT by eleni121 (http://www.serfes.org/orthodox/memoryof.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: utherdoul

Well, I can tell you how it should be handled.

An American President should, after 9/11, have invited the King of Saudi Arabia to the White House as an honored guest at an official State Dinner and had this private exchange exchange with the him.

“Your Majesty, an act of gross, overt, and unprovoked aggression has been wrought on the United States by a group who were and are of aherents of Islam, in the name of Islam’s god. The leader of that group is one of your subjects, as were most of the perpetrators who carried out the plot.

There can be no doubt that there are those in the Muslim faith who wish to draw the United States into a war. I don’t want this, as I am sure neither do you.

This attack, however, has led me to conclude that we must at a minimum be prepared to fight a very unconventional war on very unconventional terms. I think we should understand each other on very plainly stated words.

It’s with that said that I must inform you the United States now has intercontinental ballistic missiles targeted on the Islamic Holy shrines at Mecca and Medina. These missiles are armed with 15 megaton theater-grade nuclear warheads.

If one more drop of innocent American blood is spilled by any Muslim for any reason, the United States will assume that we are indeed at war, and respond in a fashion so as to put a very immediate end to the hostilities, at their source.

Your Majesty, we can have war, or we can have peace. The choice of which is up to you. Please enjoy your dinner.”


11 posted on 09/09/2010 11:27:36 AM PDT by Yudan (Living comes much easier once we admit we're dying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: utherdoul
How would Americans back then have dealt with the radical islam problem we see today? I’m posing the question seriously.

Had radical Muslims posed a domestic threat at the time, the federal government and state as well as local police would have worked with the American Protective League to make short work of them--just as they did with the Bolsheviks, anarchists, syndicalists, and real or imagined German sympathizers.

13 posted on 09/09/2010 11:54:46 AM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson