Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Swordmaker

Uh, this idiot of a researcher left out HTC.

HTC has been trading publicly since 2002 (well before the iPhone’s introduction).

This stupid “analyst” negates to even include reasoning as to why HTC is not considered a phone vendor in the US.

Swordmaker, it figures you’d post this.


3 posted on 08/18/2010 11:28:43 AM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeMind
This stupid “analyst” negates to even include reasoning as to why HTC is not considered a phone vendor in the US.

HTC is on the chart in volume, but is it on the chart in terms of profits?

11 posted on 08/18/2010 12:11:47 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeMind
Uh, this idiot of a researcher left out HTC.

Uh, no, he didn't. He specified which phone vendors where included and why:

"The first chart shows the EBIT from the top seven vendors of mobile phones since the quarter when the iPhone launched. I annotated Nokia and Apple’s bars to give perspective."

HTC was not in the top seven. US figures were not considered... this was WORLD WIDE Vendors... the statistics are correct.

25 posted on 08/19/2010 12:33:13 AM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft product "insult" free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson