[Mr. K]

now there is just this statement saying they were 'forced' to remove the story.

Who 'forced' them and how?

Wouldn't they need to see it to investigate what is on there?

[La Lydia]

I am as paranoid as anyone here, but perhaps it contained a factual error. They said they “were forced,” not that “fill in the blank” forced them. Perhaps they will explain later.

[The Sons of Liberty]

Does anyone still have any doubts that The Constitution is null and void, or that der Fuhrer 0bama is a dictator?

[E. Pluribus Unum]

HuffyPuffPost

[mnehring]

The story is still there, just under a different title.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/aug/6/pentagon-bars-staff-from-visiting-wikileaks-site/

(Aug 6 vs Aug 5 date in URL).

[dalebert]

shadow government is in control

[jmcenanly]

This is the story you were looking for
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/aug/6/pentagon-bars-staff-from-visiting-wikileaks-site/

[onyx]

That story has been removed from the site

Every so often we are forced to remove stories from our site. We’re sorry but you just happened to request one of them.

Take a look at some of the other content on our site by going to our home page.

[a fool in paradise]

If it is criminal to download a protected movie or other illegal content from the web then the conclusion should be drawn that it is ALSO criminal to download the wikileaks content no matter if you claim to live in a journalist’s ivory tower.

Espionage and treason are crimes.