H/T to HardOCP .
I am running Ubuntu on a used dell 810 I got for $30 (nothing wrong with it really) and really like it a lot.
For those of us who compile our own kernels (2.6.35 just came out a few days ago), we can turn off a lot of code that for devices and facilities we don’t need. This limits the attack horizon and reduces system overhead.
Hmmm... not so sure here...but what the hey... I suspect that unix/Linux is more secure because it is less used than Windows and not exploited as much. May be untrue, just my feelings. Now I do love Ubuntu so am not totally prejudiced...just that I think you might be a bit unfair.
Windows has become more secure (Windows 7) and really should not be denigrated so much. I do think that Ubuntu is a really nice alternative though.
Security will eventually depend upon which operating system is in the majority. I do like the faster response to fixing problems in Ubunto though - that is a plus.
Otherwise, this is not much of a revelation - the dominating OS will always be a target and have the most problems.
To all those that look for reasons to NOT use Windows, well good luck... It is a good operating system and will probably remain the dominate system for the next decade.
Hardly anybody uses it...
>> Why Linux Is More Secure Than Windows
Because Windows users are more insecure.
for later
Current project is trying to get Ubuntu (but it's looking more like it'll be Lucid Puppy) to run on this old thing that I inherited this week.
It looks like a laptop, but has no battery nor PCMCIA slot.
Its RAM is a 256MB, PC133 stick (not SODIMM), upgradeable to a whopping 512MB.
Celeron CPU, and a whole 10 gigs on the hard drive.