Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/04/2010 10:58:22 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ShadowAce

H/T to HardOCP .


2 posted on 08/04/2010 11:02:49 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I am running Ubuntu on a used dell 810 I got for $30 (nothing wrong with it really) and really like it a lot.


3 posted on 08/04/2010 11:06:52 PM PDT by wally_bert (It's sheer elegance in its simplicity! - The Middleman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

For those of us who compile our own kernels (2.6.35 just came out a few days ago), we can turn off a lot of code that for devices and facilities we don’t need. This limits the attack horizon and reduces system overhead.


4 posted on 08/04/2010 11:11:33 PM PDT by re_nortex (DP...that's what I like about Texas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Hmmm... not so sure here...but what the hey... I suspect that unix/Linux is more secure because it is less used than Windows and not exploited as much. May be untrue, just my feelings. Now I do love Ubuntu so am not totally prejudiced...just that I think you might be a bit unfair.

Windows has become more secure (Windows 7) and really should not be denigrated so much. I do think that Ubuntu is a really nice alternative though.

Security will eventually depend upon which operating system is in the majority. I do like the faster response to fixing problems in Ubunto though - that is a plus.

Otherwise, this is not much of a revelation - the dominating OS will always be a target and have the most problems.

To all those that look for reasons to NOT use Windows, well good luck... It is a good operating system and will probably remain the dominate system for the next decade.


6 posted on 08/04/2010 11:16:38 PM PDT by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Probably for the same reason that Firefox has less security risks than IE.

Hardly anybody uses it...

7 posted on 08/04/2010 11:32:29 PM PDT by Carling (Remember November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

>> Why Linux Is More Secure Than Windows

Because Windows users are more insecure.


23 posted on 08/05/2010 1:17:01 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

for later


26 posted on 08/05/2010 2:28:34 AM PDT by politicianslie (A taxpayer voting for Obama is like a chicken voting for Colonel Sanders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...

33 posted on 08/05/2010 5:50:35 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Current project is trying to get Ubuntu (but it's looking more like it'll be Lucid Puppy) to run on this old thing that I inherited this week.

It looks like a laptop, but has no battery nor PCMCIA slot.

Its RAM is a 256MB, PC133 stick (not SODIMM), upgradeable to a whopping 512MB.

Celeron CPU, and a whole 10 gigs on the hard drive.

46 posted on 08/05/2010 9:09:56 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson