Posted on 06/16/2010 1:50:06 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
Biology professor also linked to killing 3 colleagues at Alabama university.
CANTON, Mass. - A biology professor charged with killing three of her colleagues at an Alabama university has been indicted in the 1986 shooting death of her brother in Massachusetts, prosecutors announced Wednesday.
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...
How brave of the Mass people. It took courage and incite to charge her with so little evidence.
Another prog removed from Comrade Barking Obama’s voting roll.
She looks like the Berries and Cream guy from the Starburst commercial.
Joran Van der ‘Slays’ would have been her prized pupil had she been his professor. She gets a cushier jail cell than he does however-—for now!
Justice delayed is justice denied.
Still, better than nothing.
Actually just like Van der Sloot her parents gave her cover for the first killing and she too went on to murder again.
The police dropped the ball too just like in Aruba.
crazy eyes
Wow.
You know how they talk about shows like Law & Order stealing form the headlines, it’s like reality stole this story from Law & Order!
About time. Those friends of my daughter would still be alive if justice had been done the first time around. The families would not be in the situation they are in now.
This is MA closing the barn door after the horse has been long gone. AL will execute her. This is little but face saving garbage and really no appeals court should allow such a charge to stand.
Apparently her mother was on the board that made hiring and compensation decisions for the police and was tight with the police chief. He actually ordered the arresting officers to release her and had a detective submit an investigation report weeks later calling it an accidental shooting.
Much of a muchness. Once on death row in Alabama, she will stay there until lethally injected.
They need to check and see if any other people she disliked were mysteriously killed over the years.
Same with van der Sloot, I wouldn’t be surprised if there are others.
guilty.
Why do you believe an appeals court shouldn't allow this prosecution to move forward? She wasn't tried (or even indicted) in the first alleged murder, so no double jeopardy attaches. The prosecutor made a mistake in judgment in not pursuing prosecution, but that doesn't foreclose a subsequent prosecutor from reopening the case.
If the evidence leads the prosecutor to believe that he can prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt, then he has a moral - and I would argue legal - obligation to pursue justice on behalf of the deceased.
Dat dere is an Ugly-ass b!tch.
Definitely a democrap.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.