Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Polarik
He is a mixed up and confused liberal. I like to see what he knows and does not know where he should write a detailed affidavit, then it can be determined if everything he knows is hearsay or not.

Hearsay evidence is not always worthless.

Grand Jury - Hearsay Evidence Admissible?

48 posted on 06/21/2010 1:00:58 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Red Steel; rxsid; LucyT

In his case, his hearsay testimony IS worthless because he is claiming that he “...was informed by my boss (unnamed) that we did not have a birth record [for Obama] (unverified).”

Then, he conveniently says that people in the elections office fear for their jobs and will not corroborate his claims.

Neither Adams nor his “boss” had direct access to the birth records on the DOH mainframe. Adams is trying to give the impression that he had access to them.

Elections officials did not check birth certificates to verify voters - they used drivers’ licenses, rental leases, and property records.

He’s a dead-end.


55 posted on 06/22/2010 11:29:33 AM PDT by Polarik (Obama: When destroying America is not enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson