Posted on 06/07/2010 6:55:23 PM PDT by KevinDavis
GALVESTON, Tex. — “Game-changing” and “affordable” are perhaps the most repeated adjectives spoken by NASA officials in the last few months.
The premise underlying President Obama’s proposed space policy is that development of new space technologies can speed space exploration at lower costs.
But skeptics in Congress counter that NASA has provided too few details to convince them that they should largely throw away the $10 billion that has been spent so far in NASA’s Constellation moon program and spend billions more on something new.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Hey! WAIT!!
Could we send Obama to Mars?
Space seems like such a wonderful idea....;o]
Not surprising is it.
Nope..
Unicorn power! About time
More worthless studies and vague promises to use more commercial practices.
At least they helped the post-Hurricane Ike Galveston’s economy a bit. Although most workshop attendees were spending our tax dollars while they were there.
It would have been fun to crash this 0bamaSpace pork-fest and interject some suggestions for real reform. But I’m sure that would have been met with SEIU thug tactics.
I don’t think they would like my ideas..
I actually know many of these people and I know they wouldn’t like my ideas either.
Of course my first Action Item would be to fire all of them. ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.