Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Paul Pierett
However, the Sumarians have dynasties dating back 350,000 years ago

Do you have a reference for that? I've never heard such a claim. Thanks.

29 posted on 06/03/2010 9:51:45 PM PDT by Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Ha Ha Thats Very Logical

Halley’ Bible Handbook around page 79.

It was written back in 1928 before the Sharps trial. There are a lot of cultural dynamics here.

If you get deep into the ice age studies, well, hold on to your seat. These 12th planet guys don’t look so crazy.

Paul

Thanks for asking.


42 posted on 06/04/2010 11:05:40 AM PDT by Paul Pierett (Paul Pierett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Ha Ha Thats Very Logical

:’) The Sumerian king list (I think at least two copies have survived) has regnal lengths well in excess of 350,000 years, from end to end.

Among the problems (ahem) is that other sources also survive which show that the supposedly end-to-end dynasties are mostly overlapping and parallel. The problems with the numbering systems (and The Flood is mentioned right on the list itself) appear to have come about due to the use of different systems in use in each city, and the lack of a lexicon to figure out (even back then) how to interpret the numbers.

The other possibility is that these numbers refer to something other than years. Months could not be it. Even days would not work, probably, since it would require at least one ruler’s reign in excess of 1000 years.

http://www.livius.org/k/kinglist/sumerian.html


45 posted on 06/04/2010 8:31:47 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson