Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

What is current king of the hill were I ordering a general purpose desktop tomorrow Ernest ?


3 posted on 06/01/2010 10:18:43 AM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Squantos

x86 is still desktop king.

ARMs are used for portable devices (like your phone) and other embedded systems like routers.


4 posted on 06/01/2010 10:20:56 AM PDT by MetaThought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Squantos

If you need raw horsepower, x86 is your choice. If you need really low power consumption, ARM wins. They really serve orthogonal markets, very little overlap.

A 1 GHz ARM is pushing it to get 1000 MIPS; an Atom processor (lower power x86 based core) at 1 GHz delivers about 2200 MIPS. The ARM does it at about 0.3W; the Atom pulls about 0.7W.


5 posted on 06/01/2010 10:26:00 AM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Squantos
This battle is about Mobile Devices and associated Operating Systems. These article looks to have a great history of how things have come to this point...

Now to your question:

Intel and AMD own the landscape for General Purpose computers....

For Gamers and Video processors the top end Intel processors are the fastest and most expensive....

In my humble opinion for General usage AMD delivers the best Performance per buck...when you consider the whole platform including motherboard...

I just assembled a machine that has an ASUS Motherboard with the new 880 AMD chip ,...ill handle the new SATA III (6 Gb/sec and the new USB 3 ....and had BIOS ready for the AMD Thuban 6 processor chip.

Runs very nicely,...responsive and rarely encounters anything on the web that slows it down.

Motherboard and processor under half the price of the top end Intel chip.

Not as fast though...I guess...but for what I do...I doubt the intel would be faster. I do have 4 Gig of memory but rarely get over 50 & usage....

But my criteria is to have a machine that is always waiting ON ME.....

No man should wait on a Machine.....

6 posted on 06/01/2010 10:33:11 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Squantos
I want this one ...comes next year sometime from AMD:

AMD's next-gen Bulldozer is a 128-bit crunching monster

7 posted on 06/01/2010 11:24:58 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson