Here’s one of the precedents:
Based upon the language of Art. II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “Natural Born Citizens” for Art. II, section 1. purposes, regardless of the citizenship of the parents.” (Page 17)
parsy
But, playing along for a minute, did the court not caveat their own dicta by acknowledging the extralegal nature of their interpretation of Wong Kim Ark?
Why, yes, I believe they did.
Care to post that fine little bit of CYA?