Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: parsifal
That is no legal precedent, parsifal.

But, playing along for a minute, did the court not caveat their own dicta by acknowledging the extralegal nature of their interpretation of Wong Kim Ark?

Why, yes, I believe they did.

Care to post that fine little bit of CYA?

493 posted on 05/17/2010 12:55:07 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies ]


To: RegulatorCountry

I’m not seeing any such thing. Looks pretty clear to me. One sentence is a hard thing to get wrong.

parsy


494 posted on 05/17/2010 12:57:34 AM PDT by parsifal (I will be sent to an area where people are demanding free speech and I will not like it there. Orly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 493 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson