I read and draw my conclusions; and one of the factors is peoples’ motivations. How many lawyers can dance on the head of a pin may interest some people; people can obscure the simple truth with smart-sounding legalisms; done in courtrooms every business day.
I think your comments are obfuscation on purpose, so after I read comments from someone who is doing that, after a while I don’t bother to read them any more.
The vast amount of research here on FR into documentats that informed the men who wrote the Constitution is incredible. You pretend it’s unimportant, or don’t read it, or something. So your motivation is the pivot.
Someone who wants to know the truth spends a lot of time reading and considering. You and others like you on FR keep pushing the same fetid tripe over and over and over again. Never learning, never trying to.
That’s why your motivation is suspect, that and your attitude also generates suspicion. It is a wellknown fact that the administration hires people to troll on conservative websites and other forums to push the message supporting 0bama, causing doubt, putting forward arguments, etc.
This is not conjecture; it is fact. So it is natural for people on FR to wonder what peoples’ motivation is.
Case closed.
Thus your argument boils down to:
I don't think your motivations are as pure as mine so you're wrong and I'm right
So it's not a matter of logic and reason, but feelings and motives. I thought that was the domain of the left, not conservatives. It should matter what is done, not just why it is done. The former is conservative, logical, and lawful; the latter is liberal, inconsistent, and chaotic.
So go ahead, and take your own advice:
I think your comments are obfuscation on purpose, so after I read comments from someone who is doing that, after a while I don’t bother to read them any more.
Feel free to ignore my comments from here on out.