Thus your argument boils down to:
I don't think your motivations are as pure as mine so you're wrong and I'm right
So it's not a matter of logic and reason, but feelings and motives. I thought that was the domain of the left, not conservatives. It should matter what is done, not just why it is done. The former is conservative, logical, and lawful; the latter is liberal, inconsistent, and chaotic.
So go ahead, and take your own advice:
I think your comments are obfuscation on purpose, so after I read comments from someone who is doing that, after a while I don’t bother to read them any more.
Feel free to ignore my comments from here on out.
Not based on emotions. I have read for countless hours, for two years, and use whatever motherwit, common sense and perception available to me.
I cannot argue legalisms, but that does not make me unfit for using my brain.
Motives are not “feelings”. If someone is paid to post, or is a leftist wantint to support 0bama, or has a foreign wife and wants their kid to be able to be president, or just likes to whizz in the cereal - these are not “emotions”. In courtrooms motives are counted when possible crimes are committed. Motives count.
They aren’t the whole thing, but they are useful when looking at the whole picture.
More obfuscation from you.