Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: StopBigGovt
Well my wife brought home that 3 in 1 slow cooker last night. She got a great deal on it - $25 less her 10% discount - it was $22.50.

My chuck roast will not fit flat on the bottom of the 6 qt. crock but I told her we should keep it. All kinds of possible uses with the three sizes of crocks.

It has a chuck roast in it right now on its way to an seven pm finish. I put four thick slices of onion on the bottom of the crock so the roast would not sag to much. Used your recipe and directions except I had to use a little extra Cabernet Sauvignon (1 cup Heeee Heeeee) and beef stock instead of water. I cut down on the salt as the beef stock is slightly salty.

Will report on how it came out tomorrow!

I have been wondering why Crockpots are now only refered to as Slow Cookers now days?

240 posted on 05/08/2010 11:00:18 AM PDT by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]


To: Red_Devil 232

Wow, what a great deal you got on your crockpot! I agree—the 3 sizes available for that crockpot is hard to beat. Looking forward to hearing how your roast turns out!

Hmmm...using extra wine and some beef stock....sounds good to me!

I’d been wondering the same thing about why crockpots are called slow cookers. Is it to ‘modernize’ a piece of cookware that has been around for a long time, and make it more ‘attractive’ to all ages? I’m sure it’s due to some marketing study that’s found the term ‘slow cooker’ resonates with more of the population than ‘crockpot.’ What do you think?


252 posted on 05/09/2010 10:36:34 AM PDT by StopBigGovt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson