[SunkenCiv]

· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe ·
	Gods Graves Glyphs	I'd take this more seriously if the researcher would post photos of some women he's slept with. Or even some of the men. Sexual selection was discarded back at the time OoS was published, but its silly, trivial nature is as convincing as any other mid-19th century Victorian aristocratic crap that Darwin peddled. There, that should keep the wolves at bay. BTW, the actual article title seems to be "Darwin was right: MU researcher compiles evidence in support of Darwin's theory of sexual selection". Call me gutless. To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
·Dogpile · Archaeologica · LiveScience · Archaeology · Biblical Archaeology Society · · Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·

[libh8er]

More BS from the evolution crowd.

[D_Idaho]

Perhaps one day we’ll get around to determining the reason there is sexuality at all. What do you think?

[ShadowAce]

How did the two sexes come to be in the first place?

We all "evolved" from asexually reproducing amoebae, correct?