Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Chet 99

Before everyone goes crazy in defense of this man, no one here has the information on what the situation REALLY was.
It is possible that the woman had just been released or was going into a psychiatric facility and the father agreed to monitor his wife continuosly unti they could get the woman treatment, or until they were sure her medication was working.

In the Yates case, the family was NOT supportive of her continuing to get treatment and was anti -medication. Many times, the family will not cooperate with the best intentioned medical treatment.

I think there is WAY more to this story.


7 posted on 04/02/2010 7:29:55 PM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie (Ok, joke's over....Bring back Bush !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Recovering Ex-hippie

It is simply not humanly possible for a human being to monitor someone else 24/7.

Why lock up the husband when she should have been locked up in the first place?


25 posted on 04/02/2010 8:21:53 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson