maybe the only way to relieve the resultant pressure?
Posted on 03/30/2010 7:39:45 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
|
|
|||
Gods |
That's right, trouble *is* my middle name. ;') |
||
|
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
|||
Hmm. Yea, that's the ticket.
From the article: “Well, what else are they doing with their brains that used to do that kind of stuff?” I’m pretty sure that other things are being done...
The development of the large brain was not a simple accident. Studies at the University of Chicago have shown it was a complex event that occurred over a relatively short period of time. It not only required changes in size of the brain but significant changes in reproductive capabilities to accomodate larger brain size.
I wanna know what happened to the super-intelligent species cause they ain’t living in CA..
maybe the only way to relieve the resultant pressure?
LOL.
Nor anywhere where they think earning a living, growing a nest egg and taking care of your family to the extent YOU want to is “selfish” and therefore “evil” (as they do in most college faculties). I can’t think of a more stupid, idiotic, suicidal philosophy for any species to hold dear.
Is that Ron Brown?
So how does this explain Biden? Pelosi? Reid?
Trepanned skull found in the River Thames, the previous image is from the Lima Museum.
NSFW
Yep. That's why most species are born with the ability to survive alone, or at least to be able to function independently within a year of birth. For humans, the gestation lasts for a few years after birth, because no woman would survive giving birth to a child with a fully developed brain.
I first saw an ancient trepanned skull in the 1950's at the Field Museum of Natural History. Kinda freaky.
Paleolithic psychiatry, anyways.
My mother-in-law is a genetic accident that could not have been prevented.
It's as if Mother Nature allowed the two trends to continue up to the practical limit. And she didn't care how much pain a human mom went through, just so long as not too many delivering moms and their babies would die.
Momma Nature's kind of an uncaring bitch.
≤}B^)
...In a recent lecture, the Oxford neurobiologist argued that a mutation in the brain of a single human being 200,000 years ago turned intellectually able apemen into a super-intelligent species that would conquer the world. In short, Homo sapiens is a genetic accident.
Most scientists believe we achieved our intellectual status through gradual evolution. Blakemore's intervention will therefore come as a surprise and an upset, although this will not faze the provocative 66-year-old.
Apparently the headline writer is a genetic throwback to his smaller brained ancestors. Just because it was a genetic accident doesn't mean it wasn't evolution. In fact, the theory of evolution is that all genetic changes are random of which a few are beneficial and provide a significant increase in the chances to survive and breed, while others are detriments to survival and breeding. The first type pass their genes to their offspring while the second type are genetic dead ends who don't have offspring. Evolution does not require small changes. Some are going to be very big ones in one generation if they offspring are much, much better at survival than those who don't have the mutation.
multiple,very precise, the patient had nice teeth...
The answers in the second paragraph. It says, “there had been a gradual increase in brain size among hominins starting three million years ago.”
That’s just about the same time we became carnivores, which led to gradual increases in brain size. So, if 200,000 years ago, a dramatic increase in brain size occurred, we must have started eating more meat. Or McDonalds opened, 137 trillion served since 200,000 BC.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
