revoked her licker license?
From the story it seems the cops were way over the line on this one. Sounds like they were pissed they couldn’t make some other case and went after her in this fashion.
Wow—piercings, bodyfat issues, the whole works. Man, have standards slipped since my day.
I do feel sorry for her, and the police were dead wrong. She played by the rules and conducted herself honorably while in the service.
A homosexual marriage is a public declaration that violates “don’t ask don’t tell.”
No, getting married to (or even attempting to marry) someone of the same sex is not playing by DADT. That's considered 'telling'.
Why honorable? WHY HONORABLE????
But who's this fella?
The police and the Air Force were completely out of line on this one. I’m cheering the ACLU on.
Does the military have a regulation
requiring enlisted / officers to declare
their marriage status / spouse.
It would seem to be a prudent rule
As spouses can be threatened and cause security risks
Just Askn’
If third-party outing is permitted, I wonder how many gay servicemen and servicewomen have been subjected to blackmail.
How is this fat, pierced dyke an asset to the Air Force? We are in sorry ass shape if we need refuse like this.
I have no problem with booting out perverted homosexuals. This is a lifestyle choice these people make. They are not born that way. Because if they were every other disgusting lifestyle choice can defend their lifestyles.
“The Rapid City Police Department says Newsome, an aircraft armament system craftsman who spent nine years in the Air Force, was not cooperative when they showed up at her home in November with an arrest warrant for her partner, who was wanted on theft charges in Fairbanks, Alaska.”
“Newsome was at work at the base at the time and refused to immediately come home and assist the officers in finding her partner, whom she married in Iowa - where gay marriage is legal - in October.”
Don’t ask, don’t tell is a misnomer. It as never to be construed as allowing a service member to engage in homosexual activity...even in private. IF a homosexual is willing to not engage in homosexual activity....then their “orientation” is not considered important. We don’t ask if they are homosexual in their inclinations and they don’t tell us. BUT they cannot practice the act. This airmen was in a homosexual relationship that went so far as to be a “marriage.” SHE DID NOT KEEP TO THE REAL PRINCIPLES OF the rule which would better be called “we won’t ask, you don’t tell or do.”
She “outed” herself by getting married.