So a collision takes place and new matter and anti-matter are created. A quick cooling process happens and much of the matter re-coalesces into the previous matter. But some of the new matter and the new anti-matter hang around for a little while before dissipating. But the anti-matter seems to dissipate faster.
Put onto a universal scale, that might explain a few things like entropy and the imbalance of matter versus anti-matter.
No wonder God said that we couldn't understand him, we learn new basic pieces of creation so slowly.
"We know that some new particles of matter were formed immediately after the Big Bang, but they were gone within a millionth of a second or so," explains Gagliardi.
Gagliardi "knows" this? If something is gone within a millionth of a second, billions of years ago, how do they "know"? All of this is speculation and conjecture.
A question I have had regarding the Big Bang, the entire supposition is premised on everything colliding at or near the speed of light. What was prior to the Big Bang? Are these scientists still going over the Universe expanding and contracting? What about the Universe increasing in speed as it separates, as has been currently obsevered?
Dark Matter cannot explain this, nor can Newton.
This is expensive science with no practical app;ication.